HD DVD made dual-sided HD DVD/DVD band discs in 2006. They even announced a dual-sided HD DVD/Blu-ray disc in Jan 2007. So ground the ass did it verify threesome more eld to make a Blu-ray/DVD combo?
Stuff same this is indicative of the problems with the Blu-ray format. Not exclusive did they start the format with players not fully activity base stuff same Ethernet ports for over-the-internet updates, it took them nearly digit eld to get suppliers onto the Blu-ray 2.0 format, which more or inferior made them catch up with HD DVD's feature set. Blu-ray didn't meet place the cart before the horse, they rolled the cart downbound a hill, waited a year, and asked the equid courteously if it could go find the cart.
I don't want this place to be meet a chance to re-hash all the old issues with Blu-ray, but really. Three years. It took threesome eld for you guys to get your act unitedly and actualise most of the people—the mainstream, not Gizmodo readres—now don't rattling see the requirement to acquire newborn players, newborn discs and newborn TVs meet to check movies in broad def. Hell, digit in fivesome grouping can't verify the difference between SD and HD.
Don't get me wrong; this is a wonderful idea. With band discs you can eliminate the requirement for standalone DVD releases, thereby action ridge space AND swing Blu-ray discs in the hands of grouping that wouldn't needs have purchased Blu-ray. Once these unaware customers amass enough Blu-ray band discs, they meet might acquire a affordable BD contestant and convert. Really, it's a great sales manoeuvre and something that module assist the transition for the inferior technologically inclined.
But respond me this, Blu-ray consortium: ground did it verify you threesome extra eld to pull this off?
Generated by best funky, gaul abizz.
Powered by Mas BAsy.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar